<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pleximods.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pleximods.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pleximods.com</link>
	<description>Marshall Amp Modding Secrets!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bainzy Mod by HumanJHawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.pleximods.com/bainzymod.html/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>HumanJHawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleximods.com/wordpress/?p=24#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Nice. I am trying to work out how to lay this out per your suggestion #1 &quot;Rewire the mod so that Channel I’s first stage is wired to the new tube, and the extra gain stage is wired to the left half of V1. In other words, flipping the two stages round.&quot;

In doing so and looking at the signal path, I wonder why not tap the signal after the summing resistors? It seems that would have the same effect, but would allow the user to boost either channel and/or the jumpered signal from both channels.

Thoughts? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. I am trying to work out how to lay this out per your suggestion #1 &#8220;Rewire the mod so that Channel I’s first stage is wired to the new tube, and the extra gain stage is wired to the left half of V1. In other words, flipping the two stages round.&#8221;</p>
<p>In doing so and looking at the signal path, I wonder why not tap the signal after the summing resistors? It seems that would have the same effect, but would allow the user to boost either channel and/or the jumpered signal from both channels.</p>
<p>Thoughts? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JTM 45/100 &#8216;Hendrix Mod&#8217; by kurt1970</title>
		<link>http://www.pleximods.com/hendrixmod.html/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt1970</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleximods.com/wordpress/?p=6#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Hey, this looks like a cool website but looks like it was left dead for about 2 years.

I have some questions about the Hendrix Mod.  What voltage rating should the cap be for 
Method #2?  Also, what wattage rating should the resistor be for Method #2?

Hope to hear back....

Thanks,

Kurt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this looks like a cool website but looks like it was left dead for about 2 years.</p>
<p>I have some questions about the Hendrix Mod.  What voltage rating should the cap be for<br />
Method #2?  Also, what wattage rating should the resistor be for Method #2?</p>
<p>Hope to hear back&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
